July 15, 2026

The Last Question

The Last Question I have been sitting with this question for many years, and it still surprises me. Sometimes it comes during a long Vipassana sit, sometimes w...

The Last Question

I have been sitting with this question for many years, and it still surprises me. Sometimes it comes during a long Vipassana sit, sometimes while reviewing quarterly numbers, sometimes when a close friend looks at me and asks something ordinary. The question itself is simple. The answer keeps dissolving the moment I reach for it.

The Question I Keep Returning To

What are you, really?

Not your name. Not your role. Not the story you tell at dinner parties about what you do and where you are from. If I strip all of that away — the CEO title, the Polish passport, the memories, the preferences, the aching left shoulder — what remains?

I do not ask this to be clever. I ask because when I actually try to answer, honestly, I cannot find the thing I have been calling "me" for the last four decades. And that is either terrifying or liberating, depending on the day.

The Search for the One Who Is Searching

The first time I tried to locate myself, I looked in the obvious places. The body seemed like a good candidate. This is me, I thought — this hand, this face in the mirror, this heartbeat. But then I remembered that almost every cell in this body has been replaced multiple times since I was born. The body I had at seven is gone. The body I had at twenty-five is gone. And yet something feels continuous. So maybe I am not the body, or at least not only the body.

Then I looked at the mind. Surely I am my thoughts, my personality, my preferences. But when I sit quietly and watch, thoughts appear and disappear like weather. I did not choose the last thought that arose. I did not choose this one either. If I am my thoughts, who is the one noticing them? And if there is a noticer behind the thoughts, is that me? And who is noticing the noticer?

This is where the mind starts to fold in on itself. And this is where, across every culture I have studied, human beings have quietly arrived at similar territory — using very different words.

Tradition	What You Are Not	What You Might Be	The Method
Vipassana (Theravada)	The five aggregates: form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness	Anatta — no fixed self; a process, not a thing	Sustained observation of sensation
Advaita Vedanta	Body, mind, ego (the koshas)	Atman, which is Brahman — pure awareness	Self-inquiry: "Who am I?"
Ayurveda	Merely the doshas and their fluctuations	A subtle intelligence expressing through prakriti	Living in rhythm with nature
Taoism	The named, the fixed, the striving self	An expression of the Tao, which cannot be named	Wu wei — non-forcing
Sufism	The nafs — the small, hungry self	A drop returning to the ocean of the Beloved	Remembrance, dhikr, surrender
Christian mysticism	The false self, the ego	The image of God within — the ground of being	Contemplative prayer, kenosis
Stoicism	External events, reputation, possessions	The hegemonikon — the ruling faculty of reason	Daily examination, discipline

I look at this table and I do not see contradiction. I see people from very different times and places, sitting quietly, asking the same question, and reporting back with the vocabulary they had available. The Buddhist says "no self." The Vedantin says "only Self." At first these sound like opposites. But if you sit with both long enough, you begin to wonder if they are pointing at the same finger from different sides.

How did we get here, as a species, asking this question at all? What is it about being human that makes us look inward and find something we cannot name? A dog does not seem troubled by this. A tree, as far as I can tell, is at peace with being a tree. But we, somewhere along the evolutionary road, developed the capacity to turn attention back on itself. And the moment we did, we started to notice that the one who is looking cannot be found.

In my own practice, sitting hours at a time watching sensation arise and pass in the body, I have had moments where the boundary of "me" gets thin. Not gone — I am not making a grand claim. Just thin. The breath breathes. The knee aches. The thought arises. And there is no one, in that moment, doing any of it. It is just happening. And then, of course, the self rushes back in, usually with an opinion about lunch.

I run a company. I make decisions that affect real people, real budgets, real futures. And I have noticed that the decisions I make from the smaller, tighter, more defended self are worse than the ones I make from the quieter place. This is not a spiritual claim. It is an operational observation. When there is less "me" in the room, there is more room for what the situation actually needs.

Which makes me wonder if the question — what are you, really? — is not just philosophy. It might be the most practical question there is.

Beneath the Answers

There is a layer beneath all of this that I am only beginning to touch. It is the layer where the question itself starts to feel strange.

Because to ask "what am I" already assumes there is a thing to identify. It assumes separation between the asker and the answer. But when I sit long enough, the asker and the answer seem to be made of the same fabric. The question is asking itself. The looking is what is being looked for.

I do not want to overstate this. I am not a monk. I have a mortgage and a calendar full of meetings. Most days I am firmly convinced that I am Paweł, and Paweł has things to do. But there are moments — often in the last hour of a ten-day retreat, or sometimes just walking early in the morning — when the whole apparatus of being Paweł feels like a costume I have been wearing so long I forgot it was a costume.

The Ayurvedic texts talk about the body as a temporary vehicle. The Vipassana teachers talk about this life as a rare and precious opportunity. The Christian mystics talk about being a guest in this world. Different words, same suggestion: whatever you are, you are not the thing you think you are, and you are only here briefly.

I find this softens me. It makes me less defensive in meetings. It makes me kinder to my body when it hurts. It makes me more patient with people who annoy me — because if I am not really Paweł, they are probably not really who I think they are either.

What I Am Still Learning

I am not offering answers. I am forty-something years into this life and I still do not know what I am. Some days I suspect I never will, and that not-knowing is the point. The question is more useful than any answer I have ever received.

What I have learned is that the question can be held gently. It does not have to be solved. It can sit next to me while I make coffee, while I close a deal, while I lie down at night. It is a companion, not a problem.

If you are reading this and the question has started to arise in you — please do not rush to answer it. Let it stay unanswered a while. See what happens. See who is the one being troubled by it.

That, in the end, might be the only real inquiry.

FAQ

Q: Do you believe in the soul? A: I do not know what I believe. I have experienced states where something felt continuous and something felt utterly impermanent, sometimes in the same sitting. I am wary of my own beliefs. They tend to be the last thing to actually be examined.

Q: Is this a Buddhist article or a Vedantic one? A: Neither, I hope. I have studied Vipassana seriously and I read the Advaita texts with great respect. But I am not qualified to represent any tradition. I am only reporting what I notice when I sit.

Q: How do you run a company while asking these questions? A: Honestly, better than when I was not asking them. The questions do not remove clarity — they remove a certain kind of grasping. Decisions still get made. They just carry less personal weight.

Q: What would you recommend for someone starting this inquiry? A: Sit. Not to achieve anything, not to become enlightened, just to see what is here when you stop moving. Ten minutes is enough to begin. A ten-day Vipassana course, when you are ready, changes the resolution of the question entirely.

Q: Is this not just navel-gazing while the world burns? A: I have wondered this myself. My honest answer is that the people I know who have sat deeply with this question are among the most engaged, useful people I know. The inquiry does not remove you from the world. It seems to return you to it, more fully.

Q: What role does the body play in this? A: For me, a central one. Ayurveda and Thai massage taught me that the body holds the question as much as the mind does. You cannot think your way to an answer. You have to feel your way, breath by breath, sensation by sensation.

Q: Do you have a final word for the reader? A: Only this: whatever you are, you are here now. That is remarkable enough to sit with for a lifetime.

Paweł Sokołowski is a CEO, Vipassana meditator, and student of Ayurveda and Thai massage. He writes from the intersection of technology, consciousness, and the ancient body.

← Back to the journal