May 18, 2026

What Freedom Really Means

What Freedom Really Means I used to think freedom was the ability to do what I wanted. Then, after sitting still for ten days in silence, I noticed something s...

What Freedom Really Means

I used to think freedom was the ability to do what I wanted. Then, after sitting still for ten days in silence, I noticed something strange — I had all the external freedom in the world, and still, my mind was a prisoner. That was the beginning of a different question.

The Question I Keep Returning To

What if the freedom we chase — the passport, the money, the flexible calendar, the empty inbox — is not the freedom we actually need? I ask this without an answer. I ask because every time I get more of the outer kind, I notice the inner cage rattles just as loudly. Perhaps louder. How did we get here — where we built entire civilizations around the pursuit of liberty, yet so few of us feel free inside our own skin?

The Two Freedoms We Confuse

There seem to be two very different things we call by the same name.

The first is the freedom to choose. To move. To speak. To buy. To leave. This is the freedom our modern world has organized itself around, and it is precious — I would not want to live without it. My grandparents lived through times when this kind of freedom was scarce, and I carry that memory quietly.

But there is a second freedom, one that is harder to name. It is the freedom from being pushed around by our own reactions. The freedom to sit with a difficult feeling without needing to escape it. The freedom to hear criticism without collapsing, or praise without inflating. This is the freedom the contemplative traditions have been pointing at for thousands of years, and I keep wondering why we speak of it so rarely.

I have been sitting with this table for a while, trying to map what I see across the traditions I have brushed against:

Tradition	Word Used	What It Points To	The Obstacle Named
Buddhism (Vipassana)	Vimutti	Release from craving and aversion	Reactivity of the mind
Vedanta / Yoga	Moksha	Liberation from identification with the small self	Avidya — not-seeing
Stoicism	Eleutheria	Freedom from being disturbed by what is not ours	Judgments about externals
Sufism	Fana	Dissolving of the separate self	Attachment to the ego
Taoism	Wu Wei	Freedom through non-forcing	Resistance to what is
Christian mystics	Detachment	Freedom from disordered attachments	Grasping and fear

What strikes me, looking at this, is not the differences but the strange family resemblance. Every tradition seems to be saying, in its own idiom, that the cage is inside. And that we, somehow, hold the key — though we forget where we put it.

I want to be careful here. I am not a scholar of any of these traditions. I am a man who runs a company, sits in meditation, and gets his back worked on by Thai therapists who are usually kinder than I deserve. So take what I write as a traveler's notes, not a map.

But the traveler's notes are consistent. When I am reactive — when someone cancels a meeting, when the market shifts, when a colleague says something that stings — I am not free. I am being pulled by invisible strings. I can have all the money and all the calendar space in the world, and I am still being yanked around by an emotion I did not choose and cannot name.

And when, occasionally — briefly — I manage to see the reaction without becoming it, something loosens. The situation is the same. The world has not changed. But I am, for a moment, not a puppet. That moment is what I now think of as freedom.

How did we get to a place where this inner dimension of freedom is so rarely discussed? I wonder if it is because inner freedom is harder to sell. You cannot package it. You cannot photograph it. You cannot post it on LinkedIn — though God knows we try. It does not correlate with success. Some of the most externally successful people I know are the least inwardly free, and some of the poorest people I have met in India and Thailand carry a lightness I still do not understand.

I am not saying poverty is freedom. That would be romantic nonsense, and it would insult people who have suffered real deprivation. What I am saying is that the equation we assume — more choice, more freedom — may be missing a variable. Maybe several.

The Freedom That Is Already Here

There is a layer beneath the two freedoms, and it is the one I find hardest to write about.

Sometimes, in meditation, or during a long massage, or in the middle of a walk when I have stopped narrating my life for a moment — there is a sense that freedom is not something to be earned. It is not achieved through practice, though practice helps me notice it. It is more like something that was always here, obscured by the constant activity of wanting and not-wanting.

The Vipassana teachers say: observe sensation, do not react. And when I actually manage this, even for a few breaths, there is no drama. Nothing needs to change for me to be free. The tightness in my shoulder is there. The worry about tomorrow is there. But I am not identified with them. I am the space in which they arise.

I do not know if this is what the mystics meant. I suspect I am touching only the outermost skin of something enormous. But it has changed how I understand the word "freedom." It is no longer a location I am traveling toward. It is a quality of attention I sometimes remember, and more often forget.

Why do I forget so easily? That is a question I have not answered.

What I Am Still Learning

I am learning that I do not know what freedom is. I thought I did — as a young man building a company, then as a meditator, then as a student sitting on straw mats in Kerala. Each stage had its confident definition. Each definition dissolved.

What remains is a quieter kind of inquiry. When I notice myself reacting, I ask: am I free right now? Usually the answer is no, and just seeing that seems to matter more than fixing it.

I do not want to prescribe anything. I have no method to sell. I only want to leave the question open, because I think the question itself is doing more work than any answer I could offer. If you have your own answer forming as you read this, I would rather you trust that than borrow mine.

We are all, I suspect, temporary guests in these bodies and minds. Perhaps freedom is simply remembering that.

FAQ

Q: Is inner freedom just a way of accepting bad external conditions? A: I have wondered this too. My honest sense is no — inner freedom often makes people more willing to act, not less, because they are not paralyzed by fear. But I understand the concern. It is a real question worth sitting with.

Q: Do I need to meditate to experience this? A: I do not think so. Meditation is one door. Long walks, honest conversation, physical work, prayer, art — many people arrive through other doors. I only know the door I walked through.

Q: How long does it take? A: I do not know. Some days I feel closer than I did ten years ago. Some days I feel further. I have stopped measuring.

Q: Is this a religious idea? A: The traditions that describe it most clearly are religious, but the experience itself does not seem to require belief. I know atheists who describe something very similar.

Q: Can a busy CEO really live this way? A: I am trying. Imperfectly. I do not think the outer life is the obstacle — my own reactivity is the obstacle, and that travels with me whether I am in a boardroom or on a cushion.

Q: What is the first step? A: For me it was noticing how unfree I actually was. That noticing was uncomfortable, but it was the beginning.

Q: Do you feel free now, writing this? A: Sometimes, in flashes. And then I check the analytics of the article and I am reminded how much work remains.

Paweł Sokołowski is a CEO, Vipassana meditator, and student of Ayurveda and Thai massage. He writes from the intersection of technology, consciousness, and the ancient body.

← Back to the journal